Bra Tops

The supports throat and the Operation of camouflage of Cancer Of The Breast

"That you can trust when your culture is the biggest enemy of your health? Can you trust principal authorities of your cultures? Can you trust the government of your culture? Can you trust the private industry of your culture"?

We asked these questions in 1995, at the end of our book, Dressed To Kill themselves: The Link Between Cancer Of The Breast and the Supports Throat. Before to write our book, we sent details of our research to the Institute of National Cancer, Cancer Corporation American, the Panel of the President Cancer, the Association of American Medical Women, the National Organization for the Women, the Network of Health of the National Women, and the Center of Resource of Health of the National Women. There was not response. Not the one. Considering the interest lack, we decided to publish our conclusions in a book, obtaining the news directly to the women that needed to hear it.

But do the women obtain the message?

The this was 13 years since our book first was published. On this time, more than 500,000 women in the United States are alone dead cancer of the breast, with another one 2.000.000 having been diagnosed with this terrible disease -- a disease that is in most of the cases avoidable by loosening simply on or eliminate the support throat. And nevertheless, these salvage information were actively eliminated and were censored by the medical industries and of lingerie.

The examples of Elimine and the Censorship

A big business of public relations wanted to New York and anxious to help relaxs us these information to the public. "My woman had just cancer of the breast, and I am sure that you have reason," the head of the acknowledged business. A big announcement of media and the celebration were planned. The days later nevertheless the business withdrew his offer to help, declaring that one of their customers, a big medical center, opposed itself to their functioning with us.

A Sydney, the business of public relations of Australia consented to help publishes our work when we did the efforts of assistance in their country. But it, also, himself is reversed. We had asked themselves they had any conflicts of interests, as the customers of industry of lingerie. They said that they had no. But it was located that, they represented a pharmaceutical business that does a drug of treatment of cancer of the breast, and the obstacle of cancer of the breast and his treatment is in the conflict, they explained.

The Intimate Counsel of Clothing (that is the professional association United States for the industry of support throat of dollar of several billions) threatened our editor, our Group of Edition of Avery, with a process if Is Dressed To Kill was relaxed itself. The editor said that advertising would help broadcasting the word. The process never made real itself.

After the book was relaxed, the spectacle of new ones of television of NBC, the Line of change of date, was interested in to do a history on our work. We considerably were interviewed by a skeptical journalist that became a supporter. The history abruptly then was finished. The producer confidentially explained that politics of Electrique General, that possesses NBC, is to avoid histories of new diffusiones that unfavorably can influence on the other interests of GE. As it arrives, GE is a manufacturer of machines of mammography.

The magazines of the women, as the Eclat, Oneself, and of others, ran critical histories condemning our work, and find the "experts" to encourage women to continue to carry supports throat. The magazine of Her planned a positive history of the link of support-throat one/cancer, but was constrained in to pull the history by the advertising advertisers of support throat. In the various newspapers around the world, as the Custodian in the United Kingdom, the histories were pulled before the edition because of the fear that they "can terrify the public", including their advertising advertisers of lingerie.

The British Counsel of Method (that is the equivalent one of United Kingdom of the Counsel of Intimate Clothing) published the Manual of Health of Breast in 1996 to oppose our efforts. They announced the formation of the Foundation of Cancer Of The Breast of Breakthrough, that was to receive donations of the sales of support throat to subsidize the genetic research in breast cancer. The book criticized our work, claim, "THE idea that carries a support throat encourages cancer taking it out on the toxin trap were put recently forward by the researchers to the Institute for the Etudes of Culturogenic (sic) to Hawaii. The researchers of the establishments of more of August punctually dismissed it as silly things". Without the proof or without the medical research, the book informs women that carrying supports throat are a health necessity, and also should be carried first in the life as possible to prevent the breast damages.

Our original editor, Avery, was bought by Putnam of gigantic Penguin in 1998. The new editor did not enumerate the book and refused for three years to return the edition rights to the door copywrite, the Singer and Grismaijer. The book was practically unavailable, and it was thought to have gone out of characters. At last, after the ask repeated, the edition rights were relaxed us in the month of October, 2001. (The Press of ISCD kept it in the characters since).

A television documentary was produced in 2000 by Chain 4 in the United Kingdom, called, Supports Throat Them Nude Facts. In the documentary, 100 women with the disease of breast of fibrocystic went support-throat one-free for 3 months to inform the effect on the cysts of breast and the pain. Two surgeons of eminent British breasts directed the study. The results astonished, and showed clearly that the support throat is a danger of serious health. We were interviewed for the program to discuss the connection of support-throat one/cancer, that extremely was considered plausible and important by the interviewed doctors. Someone theorized that, what's more lymphatic decrease, the support throat could cause also cancer while overheating the breasts. The documentary did the newspaper headlines in the countries of British Republic through the world, but no mention of him was done the all in the United States. The following day, the headlines in the U.K. tried to eliminate fears of the link of support-throat one/cancer, and the doctors in the study distanced themselves quickly problem of cancer, saying women to continue to carry supports throat. Their research for the documentary was supposed to be published in a medical newspaper, but never was. And not the amplest research never becomes real to the continuation on their work, that they said that they would do. The vast report of the program was available on Internet little apreds it has well-ventilated, but most of the items soon were removed afterward.

No continuation studies were done to refute or confirm our research. No. While a study of Harvard, published in the European Newspaper of Cancer in 1991, discovered that the women support-throat one-free have a lower rate of cancer of the breast, the results were not central to the research they directed and were considered without importance and did not give after. Indeed, outside of our initial one 1991-93 Etude of Support Throat and Cancer Of The Breast, discussed in detail in Is Dressed To Kill itself, and our research of after Fidji, discussed in our book, To Obtain IT!, there is not always other studies on the link of support-throat one/cancer. Not even a letter or a problem discussion can be found in the medical newspaper. After the decades of research of cancer of the breast, the support throat completely always is neglected as is even a potential factor for the consideration. The this is as the study of disease of foot and neglect the shoes.

Keep the Public Mystified

This research lack, and the consecutive ignorance, then are used by the cancer organizations to justify the amplest suppression of the problem. As the American Corporation of Cancer declares on his site internet, (neglecting the study of Harvard), "there is not studies scientifically of validate that show a correlation between to carry supports throat of any type and the event of cancer of the breast. Two anthropologists did this association in a book called Is Dressed To Kill itself. Their study was not directed according to the standard principles of epidemiological research and did not take in the consideration another factors, including the risk known factors for breast cancer. There is the non other research and believable to validate this complaint of some manner". And they do not seem interested in subsidizing any such studies in the close future, or. There are other organizations that are of even critical one of the link of support-throat one/cancer for the lack of proof of research, while at the same time discouraging any research on the subject.

Of special interest is when the organizations of cancer of the in contrast to breasts the problem declare the link of support-throat one/cancer to be the "disinformation" or a "myth", without the scientific study supporting their complaints. They say that the supports throat are important for the women to carry for the support, without any supports throat of demonstration of proof are sure or necessary. They encourage then uniform mammographies, the therapy of drug of obstacle of cancer (not going counts that "obstacle therapy" be an oxymoron), and the same preventive mastectomies (that means that those that are high the risk for cancer of the breast but that does not want to obtain can have it their breast removed as an obstacle strategy). Of course, the this is more better to remove the support throat instead of the breasts, but the abduction of support throat is not a procedure of billable.

Keep present to the spirit that the supports throat were associated with the other health problems, as the headaches, the numbness in the hands, the evil of back and the other problems of postural, the cysts, the pain, skin depigmentation, and more. And the lymphatic obstruction, that is the result of constraint of support throat, already was associated with various cancers. Clearly, the link of support-throat one/cancer needs the amplest research, while the women take the precaution of relacchement.

Why the resistance?

Which poorly there could be in to follow our simple counsel, or in even preparing this problem? Why the defensive reaction?

There are three reasons:

1. The industry of support throat fears the processes of collective action. A lot of initiate acknowledged us that during years the industry suspected underwires caused cancer. They know that the supports throats stretched cause cysts and the pain. It is only a time question until a process is done against a manufacturer of support throat. As a defense, the industry changes the criticism to the customer, claiming that most of the women carry their supports throat also solidly, and should obtain from the professional installations. (How do you obtain a support throat properly of tailored pump)? Break the rows with their industry peers, and trying to exploit the bad new one, are several manufacturers of support throat that offer now patented recently supports throat claiming to soften the damages, including cancer, caused by the supports throats conventional.

2. The medical industry does billions every year on the detection and the treatment of cancer of the breast. As mentioned above, there is a conflict between the obstacle and the disease treatment, especially if the obstacle does not include drugs or surgery. The fact is that our converged treatment, oriented profit the medical system succeeds a beautiful blow treating this disease, and has billions to lose if breast cancer goes out of method with the supports throat.

Besides, the problem of support throat will revolutionize the field of cancer of the breast, bothering a lot of researchers. The research of cancer of the breast to date that neglected the problem of support throat seriously is damaged consequently, that is why them "experts" always are incapable to explain the cause of more than 70% of all cases of cancer of the breast. The researchers of cancer of career that neglected the problem of support throat will must admit this fatal defect in their work, that they are not inclined to admit in their lives.

3. At last, there is the dogmatic and timid resistance of some women that find their personal identity if connected to their supports throat that they rather would risk cancer that is support-throat one-free (that some women in fact said us). The women are cultural entities, and therefore long as our culture disdains a natural bustline, a lot of women will subject to the pain, the brands and the red collections, the cysts, and even the cancer threat instead of fact facing public potentielle the mockery (that never arrives really).

There are also women that believe the myth as the supports throat will prevent from the breasts falling. The industry of support throat admits this is a myth, while it promotes it always to improve sales. Indeed, the supports throat cause breasts to lower, as the breasts become dependent on the support throat for the support and the mechanisms of natural supports atrophies non-usage.

Despite the resistance nevertheless some women obtained the message. And a lot of people of trade of services of health, that suspected also supports throat, now spread during years this message. As the women hear the new ones and discover that eliminating the support throat eliminates also cysts and the pain, the new the amplest broadcastings of lively voice.

There are now thousands of sites internet on this subject, a lot of people of trade of services of health including the medical doctors, the doctors of naturopathic, the doctors ostedopathiques, the chiropractors, mass therapists, the lymphatic specialists, the nutritionnistes, and of others that care for women and help finish this epidemic. The people efforts to keep these living information and display has supplanted approaches it medical traditional research, that himself excluded for the lack of interest and of conflict of interests.

When a disease is caused by the culture and its habits, its attitudes, its methods and its industries, there is the limit to be the resistance to change. The industries that contribute to the disease will be defensive, and the industries that take disease advantage will be opposed. Nevertheless, the truth has a manner to obtain out, despite the resistance and the suppression. Thank Goodness that the truth has a manner to obtain out.